Which of the following statements are true regarding AutoSelection Reevaluation?

The statement that reevaluation may cause a price change, a contract to be detached, or a new contract to be attached is true because the purpose of AutoSelection Reevaluation is to ensure that the best available contract terms are applied based on the latest information and criteria. When reevaluation occurs, the system assesses all active contracts and their associated terms to determine if there is a better fit for the requisition. This process can lead to adjustments like changing the price of a contract that offers better conditions or disconnecting a contract if it is no longer applicable. Additionally, it can attach a new contract if one emerges that offers superior terms than what was previously selected.

In contrast, while the other statements may seem plausible, they oversimplify or misrepresent the functionality of AutoSelection Reevaluation. The first statement suggests that auto-selection could occur exclusively after a contract is attached, overlooking the fact that reevaluation can happen independently at multiple stages. The claim that auto-selection applies only to purchase orders limits the scope of its applicability—this process can extend to requisitions and contracts beyond just purchase orders. Finally, while it might seem intuitive that a reevaluation could make an original contract unavailable, this is context-dependent and doesn't wholly capture the breadth of the reevaluation process